And when he indicated that the one who denies the origin of revelation is deeply entrenched in disbelief, he demonstrated that by the state of the one to whom it was revealed, blessings and peace be upon him, saying to console him: "And not" meaning: We have revealed it to you while you were not "reading" meaning: you were not reading continuously and consistently at any time.

And when the intention was to negate the recitation for a long time in the past and a little of it, he included the preposition, saying: "from before it" meaning: this book which We have revealed to you; and he affirmed the comprehensiveness of the books by saying: "from a book" originally "and you do not write it" meaning: you do not renew and consistently maintain its writing; and he depicted the writing and affirmed it by saying: "with your right hand" meaning: which is the stronger of the two limbs, and he expressed that as an indication that doubt in its matter does not occur for a rational person except by consistently engaging in something like that with strong consistency that gives rise to a habit. So how if the original action did not occur? Therefore, he said: "Then" meaning: if there were anything from this consistency in the recitation or writing by which the habitual practice that leads to the habit is attained, "the deniers would have doubted" meaning: it would have been reasonable for their souls to be tasked with entering into doubt, meaning: suspicion, "the deniers" meaning: those who deny the revelation to you from the people of the Book and from the Arabs, and they say: it is mere rhymes, sorcery, poetry, and the legends of the ancients, who are entrenched in the description of invalidation, meaning: entering into falsehood. They would find a point of attack, and the Arabs would say: perhaps he took it from the books of the ancients, and the people of the Book would say: the one who is foretold among us is unlettered, but there was nothing of reading or writing as is well known of your state, let alone consistency in anything of them. So there is no doubt in your truthfulness in attributing it to Allah, the Exalted. And when the doubt is negated from its origin, the negation of what they have from it is valid, because they have no actual suspicion, their doubt is counted as non-existence, and they are called deniers based on the assumption of this suspicion, due to the presence of the remaining decisive miracles of the message, affirming the truth, just as it affirmed the truth of their prophets while they wrote and read, and their books were not revealed for the purpose of miracle. Thus, it is established that they must be characterized by invalidation due to suspicion in every assumption of writing and reading and their absence, because the reliance is on the miracles.